Zitat von witchcraft;166349
Was ich mir immer überlege ist, ob man tatsächlich von Anfang an an die Bestände geht, oder sich am Anfang noch (auch zur Tarnung) in die Reihen der Leute einreiht die nicht gepreppt haben.
Am Anfang mag es da noch Lösungen geben, ggf. zu Wucherpreisen etc. NAch längerer Krise wird es die wohl nicht mehr geben. Aber es hängt wie immer vom Krisenszenario ab.
Unbedingt einreihen!
Erstens kann man natürlich die eigenen Vorräte ein wenig schonen (was im Fall einer länger andauernden Krise auf jeden Fall ratsam ist), andererseits macht man sich geradezu verdächtig, wenn man Hilfe nicht annimt!
Es laufen in solchen Zeiten jede Menge Leute mit Helfersyndrom herum, die mit aller Gewalt "helfen" wollen. Hier gilt es: so unauffällig wie möglich sein...
Zitat "Lessons from Katrina":
Zitat26. When help gets there, you may get it whether you like it or not. There are numerous reports of aggressive, overbearing behavior by those rescuers who first arrived at disaster scenes. It’s perhaps best described as “I’m here to rescue you - I’m in charge - do as I say - if you don’t I’ll shoot you”. It appears that mid-level State functionaries and Red Cross personnel (the latter without the “shoot you” aspect, of course) were complained about most often. In one incident, a family who had prepared and survived quite well were ordered, not invited, to get onto a truck, with only the clothes on their backs. When they objected, they were threatened. They had pets, and wanted to know what would happen to them and they report that a uniformed man (agency unknown) began pointing his rifl e at the pets with the words “I’ll fix that”. The husband then trained his own shotgun on the man and explained to him, in words of approximately one syllable, what was going to happen to him if he fired a shot. The whole “rescuer” group then left, threatening dire consequences for the family (including threats to come back once they’d evacuated and torch their home).